sctovtza
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE TO
Tender Offer Statement under Section 14(d)(1) or 13(e)(1)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. 13)
PORTEC RAIL PRODUCTS, INC.
(Name of Subject Company (issuer))
FOSTER THOMAS COMPANY
(offeror)
a wholly-owned subsidiary of
L.B. FOSTER COMPANY
(parent of offeror)
(Names of Filing Persons (identifying status as offeror, issuer or other person))
Common Stock, $1.00 par value per share
(Title of Class of Securities)
736212101
(CUSIP Number of Class of Securities)
David Voltz
L.B. Foster Company
415 Holiday Drive
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15220
(412)-928-3417
(Name, address, and telephone numbers of person authorized
to receive notices and communications on behalf of filing persons)
with a copy to:
Lewis U. Davis, Jr., Esq.
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC
One Oxford Centre
301 Grant Street, 20th Floor
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
(412) 562-8800
Calculation of Filing Fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction valuation* |
|
|
Amount of Filing Fee** |
|
|
$114,944,143 |
|
|
$8195.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Estimated for purposes of calculating the amount of the filing fee only, in accordance with Rule
0-11 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). The calculation of
the transaction valuation assumes a purchase price of $11.80 per share and the purchase of
9,741,029 shares of Portec common stock, which
is represented by (i) 9,602,029 outstanding shares of common stock; and (ii) 139,000 shares of
common stock that were issuable with respect to all outstanding options, in each case as provided
by Portec, as of the most recent practicable date. |
|
** |
|
The amount of the filing fee was calculated in accordance with Section 14(g)(3) of the Exchange
Act, and equals $71.30 per million dollars of the transaction valuation amount. |
þ Check the box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the
filing with
which the offsetting fee was previously paid. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number,
or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
|
Amount Previously Paid: $8,133
|
|
Filing Party: L.B. Foster Company and Foster Thomas Company |
Form or Registration No.: Schedule TO-T
|
|
Date Filed: February 26, 2010 |
o Check the box if the filing relates solely to preliminary communications made before the
commencement of
a tender offer.
Check the appropriate boxes below to designate any transactions to which the statement relates:
þ third-party tender offer subject to Rule 14d-1.
o issuer tender offer subject to Rule 13e-4.
o going-private transaction subject to Rule 13e-3.
þ amendment to Schedule 13D under Rule 13d-2.
Check the following box if the filing is a final amendment reporting the results of the tender
offer: o
TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Amendment No. 13 (Amendment No. 13) amends and supplements the Tender Offer
Statement on Schedule TO originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February
26, 2010, as amended (the Schedule TO), by (i) Foster Thomas Company, a West Virginia corporation
(the Purchaser) and a wholly-owned subsidiary of L.B. Foster Company, a Pennsylvania corporation
(Parent), and (ii) Parent. The Schedule TO relates to the offer by the Purchaser to purchase all
of the outstanding shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per share (the Shares), of Portec Rail
Products, Inc., a West Virginia corporation (Portec), at a purchase price of $11.71 per Share,
net to the seller in cash, without interest thereon and less any applicable withholding or stock
transfer taxes, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase
dated February 26, 2010 (which, together with any amendments and supplements thereto, collectively
constitute the Offer to Purchase) and in the related Letter of Transmittal, copies of which are
filed with the Schedule TO as Exhibits (a)(1)(A) and (a)(1)(B), respectively. Capitalized terms
used and not otherwise defined in this Amendment No. 13 have the meanings assigned to such terms in
the Schedule TO or the Offer to Purchase. This Amendment No. 13 is being filed on behalf of the
Purchaser and Parent. Pursuant to General Instruction F to Schedule TO, the information contained
in the Offer to Purchase, including all schedules and annexes thereto, is hereby expressly
incorporated by reference in answers to Items 1 through 11 of the Schedule TO and is supplemented
by the information specifically provided for herein.
The reference to $11.71 in the introductory paragraph of the Schedule TO is hereby amended to
$11.80.
The reference to $11.71 on the Cover Page to the Offer to Purchase is hereby
amended to $11.80.
The reference to $11.71 in the response to the question Will the Offer be followed by a
merger? is hereby amended to $11.80.
Item 1. Summary Term Sheet
The Summary Term Sheet in the Offer to Purchase is hereby amended as follows:
The reference to $11.71 in the response to the heading Price Offered Per Share: is hereby
amended to $11.80.
The references to $11.71 in the second and third bullet points under the heading Principal
Terms are hereby amended to $11.80.
Item 2. Subject Company Information.
The reference to $11.71 in Section 2(b) of the Schedule TO is hereby amended to $11.80.
Item 11. Additional Information.
Items 4, 5 and 6 of the Schedule TO are amended and supplemented to include the following:
The reference to $11.71 in the first paragraph under the heading Introduction in the Offer
to Purchase is hereby amended to $11.80.
The reference to $11.71 in the tenth paragraph under the heading Introduction in the Offer
to Purchase is hereby amended to $11.80.
Items 4, 5, 6, 8 and 11 of the Schedule TO are amended and supplemented to include the
following:
The following paragraph is added to the end of Section 11 The Transaction Agreements -
The Merger Agreement of the Offer to Purchase:
On August 30, 2010, L.B. Foster, Purchaser and Portec executed the Second Amendment to the
Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Second Amendment) pursuant to which the L.B. Foster increased
the Per Share Amount being offered to Portec shareholders to $11.80 and the Drop Dead Date was
extended until the close
of business on December 30, 2010. Additionally, the Second Amendment revises clause (ix) of the
proviso to the definition of Company Material Adverse Effect contained in Section 3.1(a) of the
Merger Agreement to provide that any Permitted Divestiture shall not be a Company Material Adverse
Effect, and amends condition (h) of Annex I to provide that a Permitted Divestiture shall not be an
impediment to the satisfaction of that condition. Permitted Divestiture means the
divestiture upon terms that are usual and customary with respect to divestitures required by the
Antitrust Division of (i) Portecs Huntington, West Virginia facility, (ii) the tangible assets
used primarily in connection with Portecs bonded insulated rail joints (assemblies and kits), Thermabond insulated joint kits,
polyurethane coat insulated rail joints, end posts, poly gage and tie plates, fiberglass (CyPly)
joint kits, plastic insulation joint kits and plastic and canvas insulated gage plates, standard joints, compromise and transition joints, and Weldmate
joint bars and (iii) Portecs intangible assets used primarily in connection with, or necessary in
the production of, the foregoing products; but not including the tangible
and intangible assets used in connection with the lubrication and friction management business, the
shipping systems division business, the curv bloc business and the car repair business. The Second
Amendment also revises the last sentence of Section 6.5 of the Merger Agreement to except out a
Permitted Divestiture from the provision that nothing in the Merger Agreement shall obligate
L.B. Foster or Purchaser to agree to hold separate or to dispose of any assets or businesses of
L.B. Foster and its subsidiaries or of Portec and its subsidiaries. Lastly, the Second Amendment
amends Section 8.3 of the Merger Agreement to provide that if, under certain circumstances, L.B.
Foster does not acquire shares of Portec pursuant to the Offer, L.B. Foster may owe a termination
fee to Portec in the amount of $2,000,000. A copy of the Second Amendment is filed as Exhibit
(a)(5)(T) hereto, and is incorporated herein by reference.
The last paragraph of Section 11 The Transaction Agreements The Merger Agreement -
HSR Act Filings; Reasonable Efforts; Notification of the Offer to Purchase is hereby amended and
restated in its entirety as follows:
Each of Portec and L.B. Foster shall use its reasonable best efforts to lift any restraint,
injunction or other legal bar to the Offer, the Merger or any of the other transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement and the Tender and Voting Agreement. However, except for a
Permitted Divestiture (as hereinafter defined), neither L.B. Foster nor Purchaser shall be required
to agree to hold separate or to dispose of any assets or businesses of L.B. Foster and its
subsidiaries or of the Company and its subsidiaries.
The following paragraph is added at the end of Section 11 The Transaction Agreements -
The Merger Agreement Effect of Termination of the Offer to Purchase:
Under certain circumstances, in the event that the Merger Agreement is terminated pursuant to
the clause in the third bullet point under the subsection Termination and the Minimum Condition
was satisfied as of the expiration of the Offer, L.B. Foster may owe Portec a termination fee in
the amount of $2,000,000.
Items 5 and 11 of the Schedule TO are amended and supplemented to include the
following:
The following paragraph is added to the end of Section 10 - Background of the
Offer; Past Contacts or Negotiations with Portec of the Offer to Purchase:
Based
upon discussions with the Antitrust Division, L.B. Foster believes that it
could obtain antitrust clearance if certain assets of Portec primarily relating to the joint business of
Portecs Huntington, West Virginia facility were divested to a viable buyer. In late
August, 2010 L.B. Foster requested a further extension from Portec of the drop dead date
in the Merger Agreement to the end of December in order to have sufficient time in
which to effectuate a divestiture that would be satisfactory to the Antitrust Division.
Management and representatives engaged in various discussions and negotiations
regarding the requested extension, including with respect to a Portec request that a
termination fee would be due Portec if the Merger Agreement terminated without any
shares being bought in the Offer. On August 30, 2010 L.B. Foster, Purchaser and Portec
agreed to a second amendment to the Merger Agreement which among other matters (1)
extended the drop dead date to December 30, 2010, (2) increased the Offer price to
$11.80 per Share and (3) provides for a termination fee due Portec of $2 million if by the
drop dead date L.B. Foster has not accepted for payment Shares tendered in the Offer,
provided that the Minimum Condition was met, no shareholder of Portec obtained an
injunction against the Offer, Portec was in material compliance with its representations,
warranties and covenants, no Company Superior Proposal has occurred and Portec
reasonably cooperated with L.B. Foster to effectuate a
divestiture.
Item
7 of the Schedule TO is amended as follows:
The
first sentence of Section 12 - Source and Amount of Funds of the Offer to Purchase is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:
The Purchaser estimates that it will need approximately $125.5 million to purchase all of the Shares pursuant to the Offer and the Merger, assume or pay off existing Portec debt and pay all related fees and expenses.
Items 4 and 11 of the Schedule TO are amended and supplemented to include the following:
Section (ii)(h) of Section 14 Conditions of the Offer of the Offer to Purchase is hereby
amended and restated in its entirety as follows:
(h) any antitrust regulator or body having decided to take, institute, implement or threaten
any action proceeding, suit, investigation, enquiry or reference, or having required any action to
be taken or otherwise having done anything or having enacted, made or proposed any statute,
regulation, decision, order or change to published practice or there would be outstanding any
statute, regulation, decision or order which would or might:
|
|
|
impose any limitation on, or result in a delay in, the ability of L.B. Foster or
Purchaser directly or indirectly to acquire or hold or to exercise effectively all or
any rights of ownership in respect of shares or other securities (or the equivalent) in
the Company or its subsidiaries or on the ability of L.B. Foster directly or indirectly
to hold or exercise effectively any rights of ownership in respect of shares or other
securities (or the equivalent) in, or to exercise management control over, the Company
or any of its subsidiaries, other than in connection with a Permitted Divestiture, or |
|
|
|
|
require L.B. Foster, Company or Purchaser to divest any of their respective assets
or businesses in connection with the Offer and the Merger or any of the transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement other than a Permitted Divestiture; |
Items 4, 5, 6, and 11 of the Schedule TO are amended and supplemented to include the
following:
The following paragraph is added to the end of Section 17 Purpose; Plans for Portec -
Plans for Portec of the Offer to Purchase:
On August 30, 2010, the Merger Agreement was amended to exclude from the U.S. antitrust
condition of the Offer (condition (h)) a Permitted Divestiture. L.B. Foster has been engaged in
discussions with the Antitrust Division regarding the divestiture of certain Portec assets in order
to obtain antitrust clearance to close the contemplated acquisition. As a result, L.B. Foster and
Purchaser may enter into negotiations with third parties regarding a Permitted Divestiture. There
can be no assurance that L.B. Foster and Purchasers willingness to engage in a Permitted
Divestiture will satisfy the antitrust concerns of the Antitrust Division.
Items 1 through 11 of the Schedule TO are amended and supplemented to include the following:
In accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, on August 30, 2010, Purchaser extended
the Offer until 12:00 midnight (one minute after 11:59 p.m.) New York City, New York time on
Thursday, September 30, 2010, unless further extended. The full text of the press release issued by
L.B. Foster on August 30, 2010 announcing the Offers extension is filed as Exhibit (a)(5)(U) to
the Schedule TO and is incorporated by reference into the Schedule TO.
Accordingly, all references to the Expiration Date in the Offer to Purchase are hereby amended
to be references to 12:00 midnight, New York City, New York time on September 30, 2010.
Item 12. Exhibits.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Exhibit Name |
|
|
|
(a)(5)(T) |
|
Second Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger dated August 30, 2010, by and among
Portec Rail Products, Inc., L. B. Foster Company and Foster Thomas Company. |
|
|
|
(a)(5)(U) |
|
Press Release issued August 30, 2010 |
SIGNATURE
After due inquiry and to the best of my knowledge and belief, I certify that the information set
forth in this statement
is true, complete and correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L.B. FOSTER COMPANY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 31, 2010
|
|
By:
Name:
|
|
/s/ David L. Voltz
David L. Voltz
|
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOSTER THOMAS COMPANY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 31, 2010
|
|
By:
Name:
|
|
/s/ David L. Voltz
David L. Voltz
|
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Vice President and Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Exhibit Name |
|
|
|
(a)(5)(T)
|
|
Second Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger dated August 30, 2010, by and among
Portec Rail Products, Inc., L. B. Foster Company and Foster Thomas Company. |
|
|
|
(a)(5)(U)
|
|
Press Release issued August 30, 2010 |
exv99waw5wt
Exhibit (a) (5) (T)
SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
This Second Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger (Second Amendment) is made and entered into on this 30th day of August, 2010, by and among Portec
Rail Products, Inc., a West Virginia corporation (the Company), L. B. Foster Company, a
Pennsylvania corporation (Parent), and Foster Thomas Company, a West Virginia corporation
and wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (Acquisition Co.).
INTRODUCTION
A. The Company, Parent and Acquisition Co. have previously entered into an Agreement and Plan
of Merger, dated as of February 16, 2010 (the Merger Agreement), whereby it has been
agreed that Acquisition Co. will make a cash tender offer to acquire all of the Companys
outstanding shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per share, upon the terms and conditions set
forth in the Merger Agreement and the offer documents filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission by Parent and Acquisition Co.
B. Following the execution of the Merger Agreement, the parties received a request for
additional information from the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ)
under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and entered into a
First Amendment to the Merger Agreement dated as of May 13, 2010 (the First Amendment) in
order to enter into a Timing Agreement with the DOJ and to extend the Drop Dead Date among other
matters.
C. The parties have been unable to obtain federal antitrust clearance and believe that the DOJ
will object to the acquisition of the Company by Parent unless the acquisition is conditioned upon
the divestiture of certain lines of business whose products are manufactured in the Companys
Huntington, West Virginia plant.
D. In order to close the Offer and complete the Merger, Parent and Acquisition Co. are willing
to agree with DOJ to condition the acquisition of the Company on the divestiture of certain lines
of business whose products are manufactured in the Companys Huntington, West Virginia plant and
the Company is willing to further extend the Drop Dead Date in exchange for Parent agreeing both to
pay a fee to Company in the event that the Merger Agreement terminates, under certain
circumstances, after the Drop Dead Date and to increase the Per Share Amount.
AGREEMENT
Now, Therefore, in consideration of the foregoing premises hereby made a part of this
Agreement, the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable
consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto,
intending to be legally bound subject to the satisfaction of the conditions set forth herein,
hereby agree as follows:
1. Defined Terms. Terms not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed thereto
in the Merger Agreement as amended by the First Amendment.
2. Increase in Per Share Amount. Clause B of the Introduction in the Merger
Agreement is amended by replacing the amount $11.71 with the amount $11.80.
3. Amendment to Definition of Company Material Adverse Effect. Clause (ix) of the
proviso to the definition of Company Material Adverse Effect contained in Section 3.1(a) of the
Merger Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
(ix) any Permitted Divestiture (as hereafter defined) or any other divestiture by the
Company pursuant to Section 6.2 of this Agreement.
4. Amendment to Section 6.5. The last sentence of Section 6.5 of the Merger
Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
Except for a Permitted Divestiture (as hereinafter defined), nothing contained in this
Section or in this Agreement shall obligate the Parent or Acquisition Co. to agree to hold
separate or to dispose of any assets or businesses of the Parent and its subsidiaries or of
the Company and its Subsidiaries.
5. Amendment to Drop Dead Date. The Drop Dead Date, as defined in Section 8.1(c) of
the Merger Agreement is hereby amended such that the Drop Dead Date shall now mean the close of
business on December 30, 2010. The parties agree, for purposes of clarity, that if the shares are
accepted for payment on or prior to December 31, 2010, the Offer will be considered by both parties
as completed as of December 31, 2010, and the tendering stockholders will be considered to be in
constructive receipt of the Per Share Amount as of December 31, 2010, regardless of whether the
stockholders or the transfer agent have actually received the Per Share Amount.
6. Amendment to Section 8.3(e) and (h). Section 8.3(e) of the Merger Agreement is hereby
amended by the addition of the following sentence at the end thereof:
If (u) this Agreement is terminated pursuant to Section 8.1(c), (v) the Minimum
Condition was satisfied as of the expiration of the Offer, (w) no order or decree was
entered by a court of competent jurisdiction after August 30, 2010 which enjoined the Offer
for any length of time in connection with a complaint, action or proceeding brought by one
or more shareholders of Company (including, without limitation, any shareholder derivative
action in the name or on behalf of Company), (x) Company was not at the time of termination
of this Agreement in breach of any representation or warranty of the Company contained in
this Agreement that is reasonably expected to result in a Company Material Adverse Effect or
in material breach of any covenant of the Company contained in this Agreement, (y) no
Company Superior Proposal has occurred, and (z) the Company had reasonably cooperated with
Parent in Parents efforts to effectuate a Permitted Divestiture or any other divestiture by
the Company pursuant to Section 6.2 of this Agreement (including taking all steps necessary
to authorize a Permitted Divestiture or any other divestiture by the Company pursuant to
Section 6.2 of this Agreement and, if requested by Parent, entering into an agreement with a
third party buyer to effectuate a
2
Permitted Divestiture or any other divestiture by the Company pursuant to Section 6.2 of
this Agreement and being prepared to consummate the transactions contemplated by such
agreement subject to the proviso set forth in Section 6.2 of this Agreement), then a fee in
immediately available United States Dollars in the amount of two million dollars
($2,000,000.00) shall be paid by the Parent to the Company within two (2) Business Days of
termination.
Section 8.3(h) of the Merger Agreement is hereby amended by deleting and replacing in its
entirety the introductory phrase If the Parent fails to pay when due the fee set forth at
Section 8.3(e) with the phrase If the Parent fails to pay when due a fee set forth in
Section 8.3(e).
7. Amendment to Tender Offer Conditions. Condition (h) of Annex I, Conditions of the
Offer, is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
(h) any antitrust regulator or body having decided to take, institute, implement or threaten
any action, proceeding, suit, investigation, enquiry or reference, or having required any action to
be taken or otherwise having done anything or having enacted, made or proposed any statute,
regulation, decision, order or change to published practice or there would be outstanding any
statute, regulation, decision or order which would or might:
|
1. |
|
impose any limitation on, or result in a delay in, the ability of
Parent or Acquisition Co. directly or indirectly to acquire or hold or to exercise
effectively all or any rights of ownership in respect of shares or other securities
(or the equivalent) in the Company or its Subsidiaries or on the ability of Parent
directly or indirectly to hold or exercise effectively any rights of ownership in
respect of shares or other securities (or the equivalent) in, or to exercise
management control over, the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, other than in
connection with a Permitted Divestiture (as hereafter defined), or |
|
|
2. |
|
require Parent, Company or Acquisition Co. to divest any of their
respective assets or businesses in connection with the Offer and the Merger or any
of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement other than a Permitted
Divestiture; |
A new sentence is added at the end of the paragraph following condition (j) of Annex I, Conditions
of the Offer, which sentence reads in its entirety as follows:
3
The term Permitted Divestiture shall mean the divestiture upon terms that are usual and
customary with respect to divestitures required by the DOJ, of (i) the Companys Huntington, West
Virginia facility, (ii) the tangible assets used primarily in connection with the Companys bonded
insulated rail joints (assemblies and kits), Thermabond insulated
joint kits, polyurethane coat insulated rail joints, end posts,
poly gage and tie plates, fiberglass (CyPly) joint kits, plastic
insulation joint kits and plastic and canvas insulated gage plates, standard joints,
compromise and transition joints, and Weldmate joint bars, and (iii) the Companys intangible
assets used primarily in connection with, or necessary in the production of, the foregoing
products; but not including the tangible and intangible assets used in
connection with the lubrication and friction management business, the shipping systems division
business, the curv bloc business and the car repair business.
8. Consent to Communication with DOJ. In the event that Parent terminates the Merger
Agreement due to the failure of condition (h), as amended hereby, to be satisfied, Parent consents
to Company engaging in communications with DOJ regarding discussions which had occurred between
Parent and DOJ concerning divestiture of Companys lines of business.
9. Miscellaneous.
(a) Except as specifically amended herein, the Merger Agreement as amended by the First
Amendment and all other documents, instruments and agreements executed and/or delivered in
connection therewith, shall remain in full force and effect, and are hereby ratified and confirmed.
(b) This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and
their respective successors and assigns and shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, without regard to any conflicts of laws principles
thereto that would call for the application of the laws of another jurisdiction.
(c) This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original
and all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. Signatures delivered by means of
facsimile, .pdf or other electronic transmission shall be valid and binding to the same extent as
the delivery of original signatures.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]
4
In Witness Whereof, the parties have caused this Second Amendment to Agreement and
Plan of Merger to be executed as of the date first above written.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPANY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PORTEC RAIL PRODUCTS, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Marshall T. Reynolds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Its: |
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PARENT: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. B. FOSTER COMPANY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Stan Hasselbusch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Its: |
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACQUISITION CO.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOSTER THOMAS COMPANY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Stan Hasselbusch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Its: |
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exv99waw5wu
Exhibit (a) (5) (U)
L.B. Foster and Portec Announce Second Amendment to Merger Agreement and extension of Tender
Offer
PITTSBURGH, PA, August 30, 2010 L.B. Foster Company (L.B. Foster, NASDAQ: FSTR) and Portec
Rail Products, Inc. (Portec, NASDAQ: PRPX) today announced that they have executed a second
amendment (the Second Amendment) to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated February 16, 2010
(Merger Agreement), which was initially amended on May 13, 2010. Pursuant to the Second
Amendment, L.B. Foster and Portec agreed to extend the drop dead date of the Merger Agreement
from August 31, 2010 until December 30, 2010. In exchange for Portec agreeing to the extension,
L.B. Foster has agreed to both increase the tender offer share price from $11.71 per share to
$11.80 per share and, subject to certain conditions, pay Portec $2 million should the transaction
not close by December 30, 2010.
The primary obstacle to the acquisition has been the antitrust concerns of the Antitrust Division
of the Department of Justice (DOJ), particularly related to Portecs domestic joint business.
Although there can be no assurance that L.B. Foster will satisfy the DOJs antitrust concerns, L.B.
Foster believes that the DOJ should approve the transaction if assets relating to the joint
business of Portecs Huntington, WV facility are divested to a viable buyer. Readers are cautioned
to read the Second Amendment which is being filed with an amendment to L.B. Fosters tender offer
documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
In connection with the execution of the Second Amendment, L.B. Foster also announced today that it
is extending its previously announced cash tender offer, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Foster
Thomas Company, for all outstanding shares of common stock of Portec until 12:00 midnight, New York
City time, on September 30, 2010. The tender offer was previously set to expire at midnight, New
York City Time on August 30, 2010.
As of August 30, 2010, 7,784,297 shares of common stock had been tendered in and not withdrawn from
the offer. These tendered shares, in addition to the 185,500 shares that L.B. Foster already owns,
constituted 82.96% of the outstanding shares of common stock.
About Portec Rail Products, Inc.
Established in 1906, Portec serves both domestic and international rail markets by manufacturing,
supplying and distributing a broad range of rail products, rail anchors, rail spikes, railway
friction management products and systems, rail joints, railway wayside data collection and data
management systems and freight car securement systems. Portec also manufactures material handling
equipment for industries outside the rail transportation sector through its United Kingdom
operation. Portec operates through its four global business segments: Railway Maintenance Products
(Salient Systems), Shipping Systems, Portec Rail Nova Scotia Company in Canada (Kelsan friction
management, rail anchor and spike products), and Portec Rail Products, Ltd. in the UK (material
handling and Coronet Rail products). Portec Rail Products is headquartered in Pittsburgh, PA.
About L.B. Foster Company
L.B. Foster is a leading manufacturer, fabricator and distributor of products and services for the
rail, construction, energy and utility markets with approximately 30 locations throughout the
United States. The Company was founded in 1902 and is headquartered in Pittsburgh, PA. Please
visit our Website: www.lbfoster.com.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements. Such statements include, but are not
limited to, statements about the anticipated timing of the closing of the transaction involving
L.B. Foster and Portec and the expected benefits of the transaction, including potential synergies
and cost savings, future financial and operating results, and the combined companys plans and
objectives. In addition, statements made in this communication about anticipated financial
results, future operational improvements and results or regulatory approvals are also
forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current expectations of future events.
If underlying assumptions prove inaccurate or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, actual
results could vary materially from L.B. Fosters and Portecs expectations.
Risks and uncertainties include the satisfaction of closing conditions for the acquisition,
including clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act; the tender of
sixty-five percent of the outstanding shares of common stock of Portec Rail Products, Inc.,
calculated on a fully diluted basis; the possibility that the transaction will not be completed, or
if completed, not completed on a timely basis; the potential that market segment growth will not
follow historical patterns; general industry conditions and competition; business and economic
conditions, such as interest rate and currency exchange rate fluctuations; technological advances
and patents attained by competitors; and domestic and foreign governmental laws and regulations.
L.B. Foster can give no assurance that any of the transactions related to the tender offer will be
completed or that the conditions to the tender offer and the merger will be satisfied. A further
list and description of additional business risks, uncertainties and other factors can be found in
Portecs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as well as other
Portec SEC filings and in L.B. Fosters Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009 as well as other L.B. Foster SEC filings. Copies of these filings, as well as
subsequent filings, are available online at www.sec.gov, www.portecrail.com and www.lbfoster.com.
Many of the factors that will determine the outcome of the subject matter of this communication are
beyond L.B. Fosters or Portecs ability to control or predict. Neither L.B. Foster nor Portec
undertakes to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information or future events
or developments.
Important Additional Information
The tender offer (the Offer) described in this press release for all of the outstanding shares of
common stock of Portec has been made pursuant to a Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO,
containing an offer to purchase, a letter of transmittal and other documents relating to the Offer
(the Tender Offer Documents), which L.B. Foster and Foster Thomas Company, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of L.B. Foster, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) and first
mailed to Portec stockholders on February 26, 2010. Also on February 26, 2010, Portec filed with
the SEC a related Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9, which was amended and
restated in its entirety by Amendment No. 9 to the
Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9 that Portec filed with the SEC on May 18,
2010 (the Solicitation/Recommendation Statement). This press release is for informational
purposes only and does not constitute an offer to purchase shares of common stock of Portec, nor is
it a substitute for the Tender Offer Documents. Portec stockholders are strongly advised to read
the Tender Offer Documents, the Solicitation/Recommendation Statement and other relevant materials
as they become available, because they contain important information about the Offer that should be
read carefully before any decision is made with respect to the Offer.
Portec stockholders can obtain copies of these materials (and all other related documents filed
with the SEC), when available, at no charge on the SECs website at www.sec.gov. In addition,
investors and stockholders will be able to obtain free copies of the Tender Offer Documents by
mailing a request to: Jeff Kondis, Manager, Corporate Marketing, L.B. Foster Company, 415 Holiday
Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15220, or by email to: jkondis@lbfosterco.com, and free copies of the
Solicitation/Recommendation Statement by mailing a request to: John N. Pesarsick, Chief Financial
Officer, Portec Rail Products, Inc., 900 Old Freeport Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15238, or by email to:
jpesarsick@portecrail.com. Investors and Portec stockholders may also read and copy any reports,
statements and other information filed by L.B. Foster or Portec with the SEC, at the SEC public
reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330
or visit the SECs website for further information on its public reference room.
Contact information: David Russo (412) 928-3450
drusso@lbfosterco.com